翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Section sign ・ Section Six of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms ・ Section Sixteen of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms ・ Section spéciale ・ Section summary of the Patriot Act, Title II ・ Section Ten of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms ・ Section Thirteen of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms ・ Section Thirty of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms ・ Section Thirty, Minnesota ・ Section Thirty-five of the Constitution Act, 1982 ・ Section Thirty-four of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms ・ Section Thirty-one of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms ・ Section Thirty-three of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms ・ Section Thirty-two of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms ・ Section Three of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms ・ Section Twelve of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms ・ Section Twenty of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms ・ Section Twenty-eight of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms ・ Section Twenty-five of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms ・ Section Twenty-four of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms ・ Section Twenty-nine of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms ・ Section Twenty-one of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms ・ Section Twenty-seven of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms ・ Section Twenty-six of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms ・ Section Twenty-three of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms ・ Section Twenty-two of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms ・ Section Two of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms ・ Section X ・ Section Z ・ Section Zero Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Section Twelve of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms ： ウィキペディア英語版 Section Twelve of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Section 12 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, as part of the Constitution of Canada, is a legal rights section that protects an individual's freedom from cruel and unusual punishments in Canada. The section has generated some case law, including the essential case ''R. v. Smith'' (1987), in which it was partially defined, and ''R. v. Latimer'' (2001), a famous case in which Saskatchewan farmer Robert Latimer protested that his long, mandatory minimum sentence for the murder of his disabled daughter was cruel and unusual. The section states: ==Definition== ''R. v. Smith''〔Smith v. R., 1987 CanLII 64 (S.C.C.), () 1 S.C.R. 1045.〕 was the first case in which section 12 was considered by the Supreme Court of Canada. The Court, however, could and did follow previous interpretations of cruel and unusual punishments in pre-Charter case law, namely ''Miller and Cockriell v. The Queen'' (1977). Cruel and unusual punishment was thus defined as punishment "so excessive as to outrage standards of decency" or "grossly disproportionate to what would have been appropriate." Justice Lamer, writing for the Court in ''R. v. Smith'', went on to provide some guides as to how to measure proportionality, listing as special considerations the seriousness of the crime committed by the individual, the "personal characteristics" of the individual, and the various types of punishments available that could effectively "punish, rehabilitate or deter this particular offender or to protect the public from this particular offender." Later, the Court would add in ''R. v. Goltz'' (1991)〔R. v. Goltz, 1991 CanLII 51 (S.C.C.), () 3 S.C.R. 485.〕 and ''R. v. Morrisey'' (2000)〔R. v. Morrisey, 2000 SCC 39 (CanLII), () 2 S.C.R. 90, 2000 SCC 39.〕 that how the individual would be impacted by the punishment in practise, the objectives of the punishment, whether other kinds of punishments could be used instead, and how other types of criminals are punished could be relevant to a section 12 test. Still, the test is not strict but rather deferential to the government. In ''Steele v. Mountain Institution'' (1990),〔Steele v. Mountain Institution, 1990 CanLII 50 (S.C.C.), () 2 S.C.R. 1385.〕 Justice Cory wrote for the Court that a judicial discovery of a cruel and unusual punishment should be "rare and unique". The Parliament of Canada's ability to judge the appropriateness of various punishments is not absolute, but courts are generally encouraged to exercise restraint in correcting Parliament. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Section Twelve of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.